Topic: How To Invest

Dear Pat: I have been a subscriber for almost 20 years and have done well on your recommendations, but I missed out on Alimentation Couche-Tard. I never bought it because I thought its business model was too close to that of Loewen Group, in that it relies heavily on acquisitions. Loewen Group was one of my largest losses. Why do you think Alimentation Couche-Tard will not suffer the same fate as Loewen Group?

Article Excerpt

In June 1999, the Loewen Group, North America’s second-largest funeral company, filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. and Canada. At the time, it operated 1,116 funeral homes and 429 cemeteries in North America and 32 funeral homes in the U.K. Loewen Group grew rapidly by acquisition, but it made other moves that greatly added to its risk. For one, it took on a lot of debt to finance its purchases, many of which it bought at inflated prices in bidding wars with larger rival Service Corporation International. The new operations’ profits didn’t cover the extra interest costs. Loewen eventually had to sell many of them below cost to comply with its debt obligations. Loewen Group’s debt stood at $2.3 billion when it filed for bankruptcy in 1999. That was high even in relation to its market cap of $3.4 billion at its stock-price peak of $57 in 1996. It was insurmountable in 1998,…