Dividend Stocks
Dividends can produce as much as a third of your total return over long periods, and you can even retire on dividends.
There are 4 key stock dividend dates that are involved with dividend payments:
1- The Declaration Date is several weeks in advance of a dividend payment—it’s when company’s board of directors sets the amount and timing of the proposed payment.
2- The Payable Date is the date set by the board on which the dividend will actually be paid out to shareholders.
3- The Record Date is for shareholders who hold the stock before the payable date and receive the dividend payment. That date is set any number of weeks before the payable date.
4-The Ex-Dividend Date is two business days before the record date and it’s when the shares begin to trade without their dividend. If you buy stocks one day or more before their ex-dividend date, you will still get the dividend. That’s when a stock is said to trade cum-dividend. If you buy on the ex-dividend date or later, you won’t get the dividend. The ex-dividend date is in place to allow pending stock trades to settle.
We think very highly of stocks that have been paying dividends for five or more years, at TSI Network. Many of these stocks fit in well with our three-part Successful Investor philosophy:
1- Invest mainly in well-established companies;
2- Spread your money out across most if not all of the five main economic sectors (Manufacturing & Industry; Resources & Commodities; Consumer; Finance; and Utilities);
3- Downplay or avoid stocks in the broker/media limelight.
[text_ad use_category="243"]
Read More
Close
SAPUTO INC. $33 (Toronto symbol SAP; SI Rating: Average) has made itself the top dairy producer in Canada in the past few years through acquisitions. However, heavy regulation limits Saputo’s growth in Canada. Consequently, the company is aggressively expanding outside Canada. It is targeting the United States where it’s now the fifth-largest cheese producer, and Argentina, where it’s the third-largest dairy company. Saputo earned $0.43 a share (total $45.0 million) in its third fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, down 21.8% from $0.55 a share ($58.3 million) a year earlier....
TELUS CORP. (Toronto symbols T $44 and T.NV $44; SI Rating: Above average) is Canada’s second-largest telecommunications provider, after BCE Inc. It provides local and long distance telephone services to roughly 5 million customers, mainly in Alberta, British Columbia and parts of Quebec. It also provides Internet access services to roughly 1 million subscribers. Telus’s revenue slipped from $7.1 billion in 2001 to $7.0 billion in 2002, but rose to $8.1 billion in 2005. It lost $0.51 a share (total $145.8 million) from continuing operations in 2001, as well as $0.75 a share ($235.8 million) in 2002, mainly due to restructuring costs following the Clearnet acquisition. However, earnings improved from $0.92 a share ($324.4 million) in 2003 to $1.94 a share ($700.3 million) in 2005. Most of Telus’s recent growth comes from its wireless division, which is Canada’s largest wireless service provider with 4.5 million customers (36% of the market). The company is also doing a good job of hanging on to its customers, and getting them to sign long-term service contracts....
CANADIAN UTILITIES LTD. $39 (Toronto symbol CU.NV; SI Rating: Above average) supplies electricity and natural gas to over 1 million customers, primarily in Alberta. It also invests in overseas gas and electricity assets. In the three months ended December 31, 2005, earnings fell to $0.69 a share from $0.71 a year earlier, mostly due to higher gas franchise fees paid to municipalities. Higher electricity rates helped push revenue up 6.8%, to $680.3 million from $637.0 million. The company generated cash flow of $5.17 a share in 2005, up 22.2% from $4.23 in 2004. However, that failed to fully cover its capital costs of $4.13 a share, and its $1.10 dividend....
TRANSALTA CORP. $23 (Toronto symbol TA; SI Rating: Average) operates 51 power plants in Canada, the U.S., Mexico and Australia. It also owns 50% of a major Canadian wind farm operator. In the past few years, the company has sold its regulated operations to focus solely on its nonregulated plants. However, it sells roughly 90% of its power under long-term, firm-price contracts or directly to specific customers such as carmakers and hospitals, which helps cut its exposure to sometimes volatile electricity prices. It also uses hedges to shield itself from rising fuel costs....
EMERA INC. $20 (Toronto symbol EMA; SI Rating: Average) supplies roughly 95% of Nova Scotia’s electricity needs. This business accounts for over 80% of its income. It also owns the main electrical utility in Bangor, Maine, and holds interests in other power-related projects. In the three months ended December 31, 2005, Emera earned $0.34 a share from continuing operations, up 25.9% from $0.27 a year earlier. The savings from a new natural gas supply deal helped offset higher oil and coal costs. Revenue rose 3.7%, to $297.1 million from $286.5 million. Nova Scotia regulators let the company raise its power rates by 5.3% in 2005. Emera is now asking for a 13% hike in 2006, to cover its higher fuel costs. However, regulators will probably reject this request and approve a smaller rate hike....
FORTIS INC. $23 (Toronto symbol FTS; SI Rating: Above average) operates regulated and non-regulated power systems in Canada, the United States, Belize and the Cayman Islands. It also owns hotels and commercial real estate properties, mainly in Atlantic Canada. In 2004, the company paid $1.5 billion in cash and stock for regulated electrical utilities in Alberta and British Columbia. This helped cut Fortis’s income from its power operations in Atlantic Canada, from 50% of earnings to 30% in 2005. However, Fortis’s earnings in the fourth quarter of 2005 only crept up to $22.3 million from $21.2 million a year earlier. That’s mainly because a settlement with Alberta regulators cut the Alberta subsidiary’s earnings in the latest quarter by $3 million. Per-share earnings remained unchanged at $0.21, while revenue grew 4.7%, to $353.1 million from $337.2 million....
INCO LTD. $54 (Toronto symbol N) struggled as the Asian economic crisis led to lower nickel demand and prices. In light of the bleak outlook, it seemed that Inco overpaid for the huge Voisey’s Bay nickel deposit in Labrador. The Newfoundland government’s demand that Inco build a smelter in the province to process the ore also threatened the project’s feasibility. The high cost of the Voisey’s Bay purchase also forced Inco to quit paying dividends. But spreading prosperity around the world has spurred nickel demand and prices. That helped make it economical for Inco to build a smelter in Newfoundland. Voisey’s Bay began operations in 2005....
SOBEYS INC. $38 (Toronto symbol SBY; SI Rating: Average) is Canada’s second-largest food seller, with 1,300 stores under the Sobeys, IGA and Price Chopper banners. The company owns roughly a third of its stores; franchisees own the remaining two-thirds. The Sobey family controls 68% of the company’s stock. Like Loblaw, Sobeys used non-food items and in-store services such as pharmacies and bakeries to drive its growth. Sales rose from $9.2 billion in 2001 (fiscal years end April 30) to $12.2 billion in 2005. Earnings before unusual items grew from $1.50 a share (total $91.2 million) in 2001 to $2.85 a share ($186.7 million) in 2005. Also like Loblaw, Sobeys has invested heavily in new stores, and developed its own private label brand (“Compliments”). It’s also streamlining its distribution network by closing some facilities and expanding others....
LOBLAW COMPANIES LTD. $58 (Toronto symbol L; SI Rating: Above average) is Canada’s largest supermarket operator, with over 1,600 company-owned and franchised stores. The company also distributes food and other goods to independent retailers. George Weston Ltd. owns 63% of the company. Loblaw’s revenue grew from $21.5 billion in 2001 to $26.2 billion in 2004, as the company expanded the amount of non-food items in its stores, such as clothing and housewares. It also offered more services like dry cleaning. These moves also fueled its profit growth, from $2.04 a share (total $563 million) in 2001 to $3.48 a share ($968 million) in 2004. In 2005, Loblaw launched a new strategy aimed at protecting its market share, and keeping its costs low. The main thrust of this plan is an overhaul of its warehouse distribution network, including closing six of its 32 distribution centres....
DUNDEE CORP. $33 (Toronto symbol DBC.SV.A; SI Rating: Average) holds equity interests in several businesses. Its main asset is its 63% stake in Dundee Wealth Management Inc., which sells investments, life insurance and other financial services through about 4,000 independent advisors across Canada. Through 86%-owned Dundee Realty Corp., Dundee invests in commercial and residential real estate developments in Canada and the United States. It also invests in junior resource companies. In the three months ended September 30, 2005, Dundee earned $0.24 a share (total $6.4 million), down 56.4% from $0.55 a share ($14.4 million) a year earlier. But the latest results included a $5.0 million pre-tax charge related to Dundee’s plan to upgrade the computer systems of its brokerage operations. Revenue fell 7.7%, to $205.7 million from $222.8 million, mostly due to lower revenue from its real estate division, following last year’s sale of a condominium project. Investors tend to avoid Dundee for several reasons, including its complex holding company structure and dual-class shares....